Search for: "Polk v. Does et al"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
Michale Hemmer, Daniel Josephe, Louis Pohoryles, Brent Polkes, Linda Skalet and Jon Weintraub are several residents who challenged a developer’s plan seeking to re-zone an area of land from single use residential to a multifamily residential use. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
Sys. et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
REES, ET AL., Respondents. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
HICKS, ET AL.; from Anderson County;14th district (14? [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
Several authors have conducted extensive surveys of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank raw milk (BTM) and the dairy environment (Hancock et al 1998; Jayarao et al, 2006; LeJeune et al, 2009; Oliver et al, 2005; Oliver et al, 2005; Shere et al, 1998). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
Conservation, et al., Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Index No. 3668/2019 (the DEC Action) (together with the VP Action, the Actions) related to the 2019 Modification (NYSCEF Doc No. 71, ,i 17). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
This Davis Polk memo explains: The case, Susquehanna International Group, LLP, et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Does any monograph count? [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
” Id. at 705 n.4; see also Polk v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
” Id. at 705 n.4; see also Polk v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 06-10446-RGS. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
JDB v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Chair Gensler. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
